1 year
All ships passing through European waters must now provide proof of insurance - Splash247
splash247.comThe European Commission has adopted another key measure to crackdown on the so-called shadow fleet passing through its waters. The amendment to the Vessel Monitoring Directive now requires all vessels, including those merely passing through European Union waters without entering an EU port, to provide insurance information. “By requiring that all vessels operating in our …

Hmm.
It might be possible to prevent some vessels passing through EU waters, but some of the ships doing so are doing so using the right of innocent passage. I don’t think that it’s possible, without EU members violating UNCLOS, or an amendment to UNCLOS, to deny vessels transit through territorial waters on insurance grounds, as long as those ships are otherwise conforming to the obligations associated with their right of innocent passage. Like, say a ship were sailing through the Strait of Gibraltar or the Danish straits.
https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part2.htm
Temporary and security are not clearly defined.
No insurance is prejudicial to the good order of the EU legal framework on accidents, liability, etc. The list afterwards is not exhaustive.
Also who the fuck is going to complain. Russia? International law is whatever states get away with.
Wouldn’t repeated violations of point (k) justify a law aiming to minimise those infractions?
Excellent point, but I do have another to make which supersedes your argument:
Fuck putler and fuck his dumb fucking war.
Not an expert by any mean. But if they already did it with canceling the insurances of the Russian planes, banning effectively from the common European airspace, I see high chances of successfully implementing this.
The airspace ban wasn’t predicated on insurance.
True, somehow I mixed them both