If you look back on your exchange with Gofer you’ll find that you brought up a topic completely different from Gofer’s point not once but twice. No matter your political beliefs, that’s not good faith discussion. If anything it’s the sort of thing we (as in everyone to the left of Reagan) make fun of when right wingers and tankies do it.
Gofer presented an article. I continued the discussion presented to me. If you don’t want your statement to include the entirety of an article, then maybe just quote a piece of it and use the article as citation.
That’s the problem when they focus on the aesthetics and ‘optics’ over the truth.
The evidence is overwhelming and has been for well over a year, from reports by international human rights organizations to polls on support for the weapon embargo
Clearly my good faith discussion was wasted on you and Gofer.
If you look back on your exchange with Gofer you’ll find that you brought up a topic completely different from Gofer’s point not once but twice. No matter your political beliefs, that’s not good faith discussion. If anything it’s the sort of thing we (as in everyone to the left of Reagan) make fun of when right wingers and tankies do it.
Gofer presented an article. I continued the discussion presented to me. If you don’t want your statement to include the entirety of an article, then maybe just quote a piece of it and use the article as citation.
Sigh why do I even bother? Say hello to the concentration camps for me.
My favorite part is this all they can do is repeat already disproven talking points.
That’s the problem when they focus on the aesthetics and ‘optics’ over the truth.
The evidence is overwhelming and has been for well over a year, from reports by international human rights organizations to polls on support for the weapon embargo
Yeah but optics and vibes are all they have :/