I understand, I was just implying that Milei wasn’t ancap, and that just because someone has that philosophy doesn’t mean they’re shit, except for the Zionists.

I hope you don’t get fake Scotts and people confuse them with the real Scotts in your political philosophy.

I agree with what he says, although Milei still has several points that could be criticized.

Returning to the topic of public spending, it’s difficult because each side wants more. Argentina made those cuts because its finances weren’t doing well and inflation was rising.

The United States isn’t in that situation, so they could make those cuts more efficiently, but Trump made the cuts more for political reasons than practical ones. Added to the fact that his law, approved by Congress, makes it more likely that the United States will have more delicate finances in the future.

Milei says he’s an “anarcho-capitalist,” but he doesn’t live up to the values ​​that that political ideology preaches. Most people will think you’re part of the movement just by saying that, but they won’t investigate his actions to see if what he says is true.

But those who are in the movement will want Milei to leave, because it will only tarnish the movement and make people think they’re like that when in reality they aren’t.

Here Hoppe criticizes Milei for meeting with Netanyahu

Then this video criticizes Milei for not investigating the movement well.

Mises also criticizes Milei in an article for not closing the central banks. Link to the article

Milei is not an anarcho-capitalist. Hoppe, who belongs to that movement, criticizes Milei. As for his policies, according to the Argentine National Institute of Statistics and Census (INDEC), monthly inflation has fallen and increased by 5.8%.

The DOGE (General Administration of Geography) was a stupid idea because the GAO was there, but since they weren’t going to be partisan to his policies, they ignored it.

And how will the EU act if deepfakes are found if their servers are in China, Russia, Vietnam, Malaysia or another country?

Denmark has the best labor laws in the world.

People want to enjoy the Benicios, but not face the consequences. I think people should have financial education so as not to depend on the government and I understand Denmark’s decision, because if a solution is not applied, they could be ruined by pensions.

Rather, it was the ones who requested asylum, but in exchange, they’re going to provide information that will be useful to the Trump administration. For what purpose? I don’t know, but it could be that nothing will happen, or something will.

Why do you say they are more transparent?

In Mexico, politicians are in cahoots with drug trafficking and are corrupt. They often partner with various cartels in exchange for large sums of money. You might think this is unfounded, but it’s not actually true.

But I understand their situation because the DOJ already labels anyone as a criminal, and when they’re doing something right, it ends up being confused with something wrong.

Do you really think most candidates are brave?