1 year
Permanently Deleted
English
You must log in or register to comment.
- 1 year
Any state level talk of nuclear threat is always done from a position of weakness and in open admission of the poverty of your conventional force. It also shows a lack of understanding and inhumanity.
- ramble81@lemm.eeEnglish1 year
Uh-huh. Anyone keeping track of how many times they’ve threatened with nukes? I think this is at least 3-4 that I remember.
1 yearWho knows if any still work at this point. Maintaining nuclear weapons costs money, money that can build yachts instead.
My head cannon is putin is frantically pushing the button everyday, and everyday it does nothing, and everyday it is promised to work tomorrow.
- TronBronson@lemmy.worldEnglish1 year
Just nuke us already, it wouldn’t do a fraction of the damage trump is doing anyway.
- 1 year
Yawn
We’re so far past the last “final red line” that it’s now just a red dot on the horizon in the rearview mirror.
- InvertedParallax@lemm.eeEnglish1 year
I hope they don’t.
But if they do, it has to absolutely guarantee the 100% complete and utter extinction of the Russian race.
Because we have to set a precedent.
- Zron@lemmy.worldEnglish1 year
Ah yes, genocide is always the answer.
After all, we killed all the Germans Right?
- InvertedParallax@lemm.eeEnglish1 year
A: they committed genocide when they used a nuke
2: we killed enough nazis that the rest of the Germans learned.
If Russians couldn’t learn from the example of the Germans, then theyre beyond learning and a danger to the world.
- SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish1 year
As much as the rhetoric of Russia is weak and bordering tragic comedy, they should really really not “bring it on”
