World News@lemmy.worldbyWizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca11 monthsIsrael strikes Iran, no US involvement, US officials saywww.reuters.com English 135264272
WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.caEnglish11 monthsHiroshima and Nagasaki were not a bad call. As for your second point- in this situation is it acceptable or justified? Fuck no. Is it tactically the correct move, given what these pieces of shit are trying to accomplish? Yes. -1131%9
Cruxifux@feddit.nlEnglish11 monthsJapan was already ready to surrender. This is unclassified now. So how was it not a bad call exactly? Assuming we both agree on my first assertion. 1820
ShoeThrower@lemmy.zipEnglish11 monthsSo, in your view, intentionally killing civilians is OK if they’re Japanese, but not if they’re Palestinian. Fascinating. 1485%17
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzEnglish11 monthsYes they were ESPECIALLY Nagasaki A second one was not needed, that is easy to prove and I remain unconvinced the first bomb dropped was necessary either. 2
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not a bad call.
As for your second point- in this situation is it acceptable or justified? Fuck no. Is it tactically the correct move, given what these pieces of shit are trying to accomplish? Yes.
Japan was already ready to surrender. This is unclassified now. So how was it not a bad call exactly? Assuming we both agree on my first assertion.
So, in your view, intentionally killing civilians is OK if they’re Japanese, but not if they’re Palestinian.
Fascinating.
Yes they were ESPECIALLY Nagasaki
A second one was not needed, that is easy to prove and I remain unconvinced the first bomb dropped was necessary either.