

I think your original argument just wasn’t fully fleshed out. Seems you don’t like the guy for a lot more reason than the one you gave, which might be legitimate.


I think your original argument just wasn’t fully fleshed out. Seems you don’t like the guy for a lot more reason than the one you gave, which might be legitimate.


I’m not that familiar, tbh.


I was thinking QtPie, who is a much nicer person.
Pretty sure PewDiePie is an ass, but “he said a racial slur once ten years ago” isn’t a great argument against anyone, generally.


You’re going to equate a word with being a Nazi and rape? Using a racial slur is literally a small subset of being a Nazi.
If you think calling people Jews was the big issue with the Nazis, well…


“Death, death to the SS!”?
What would it have accomplish? What does it accomplish?
It gets Lemmy known as a hotbed of terrorism. It may cause legal and/or political trouble for the admins of the site. And what does it do that other words don’t?
Look at all the discussion here and consider how it is or isn’t limited. What’s happening in Gaza is a genocide. The IDF is responsible for it. What do death chants contribute to that conversation?


Well, yeah. We weren’t exactly quiet about it.


Whose Crimean bridge?


Draft legislation that only applies in Europe/EU


Have we though? This headline is “Spain aims to”.


Insane. Just get a bidet. You can get one that just screws on under your toilet seat.


Also the people being sent there are innocent, likely by any reasonable definition, but certainly by the definition of our Constitution.


They likely banned or hid anyone who said otherwise.


On the bright side, you don’t have to wait to shit on him. His diaper is soiled more than half of the time already. POOTUS.
I think the cyber security prof might be different.


I assure you, the recent differences are more than just talk.


I heard someone defederated from Hexbear, but I didn’t think it was us.


You’re a fucking joke if you think the last two months is representative of the US over the past 75 years.


Well, you got the first part right.


A couple issues.
The Signal chat didn’t show that anyone wanted Europe dead. Agree or not, it showed that the administration wants Europe to be responsible for their own military interests (As though the US received nothing from being the security for the West over the past 75 years.)
If they want to see Europe destroyed, those receipts have to come from elsewhere.
Secondly, helping Ukraine is in everyone’s interest except for Trump and the GOP. Stopping the stupid fucking tariffs is in America’s interests. Trump succumbing to his age is in America’s interests.
Don’t confuse America’s interests with those of the people who want to destroy and weaken America. Other than that, the point is correct. Europe needs to be much more active in Ukraine, even if the US administration may object.
No. It’d require them to use NATO funding to defend the rest of the world from us.