Ngl, trump waffling around with tarriffs is already causing major damage to the economy. Companies need to project costs for budgeting to keep their business operational, him constantly putting out changing information is causing layoffs and all sorts of chaos.

All that to say, they should really nut up sooner than later.

Should the US allow a corporation to fully integrate itself into critical infastructure that makes life or death decisions?

Now that they have teeth, they are less likely to get frivolously bombed.

Conspiracy Time!

I wonder if they are trying to flood the ‘Canada’ SEO because of this recent event:

https://globalnews.ca/news/11262681/canadian-dead-ice-custody-florida/

8hr watch, but if you love the Ethan/Hasan drama, this is for you.

https://youtu.be/aOYPKY_48HE

Here is a shorter one if you just want to see the difference of how Hasan presents his points and information and how Ethan does.

https://youtu.be/4PocFleMhUs

Regardless, like I said in the main comment, the information is what matters and not as much his takes on it.

If you want a run down on why this is significant and the potential consequences. I would recommend watching the attached vid.

I know this streamer is not favored by everyone, but the information is what matters.

https://youtu.be/llC-tSCf6W4

Hope for the future!

Time for the “Greatest Depression”.

:)

When dumbasses elected a grifter billionaire. He does truly represent unfettered capitalism though.

Praying for his safety and that NOTHING happens to him :)

The insane part is that he is doing this before the US has enough infastructure to support cutting this many trade ties with allies. The US is getting economically railed and the dumbass thinks we can just tough it out.

I have been watching this case for a little while and it looks like the most likely one to show how much power the judicial branch has under this administration.

I would wager the answer is “none”, but we won’t know for sure until it happens.

Can reporters ask what will happen if they don’t voluntarily leave?

Gotcha, thank you for being civil in your explanation. I appreciate you taking the time to break that down!

The idea was to point users to a site that looks at an overview of past issues with a news source. I was unaware that this specific site was very loose with their grading of news sites.

I am not sure if you are aware, but in online forums, it is rare that someone will even read past the headline before giving their opinion. Expecting everybody to dedicate the time and effort for a thorough inspection of every news provider and their sources is a bit of a high ask, especially now with people trying to manage their lives and the onslaught of political breaking news.

If you would like to do a service to people, you can mention what your research has come to in those various areas. If they are skeptical, they can then double check your work.

Thanks for the heads up. I was not aware of this.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mint-press-news/