• 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 10th, 2025

help-circle

  • misteloct@lemmy.worldtoEurope@feddit.org*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes. Would you allow a company to sell actual poison that is marketed as a health food? What if a study showed 50.1% of all people believed it was not actually poisonous because of a successful marketing campaign by the company? What if innocent babies and children were ingesting this poison because their parents believed it was safe?

    What if all those people believed companies shouldn’t be allowed to sell poison. But that this company should be allowed to sell their product because they mistakenly believe it’s not poison.

    If you agree with banning a child killing poison but not with banning a far right party, please explain how it’s fundamentally any different.










  • That is pants on fire false. In many cases ballots were rejected for no reason and had to be recast. Democrats and especially Black people were affected disproportionately, why do you think that is only the case in 2024? There is evidence of this being instructed to GOP party leaders as a strategy. And even if true, do you think it’s “fair” to make an all black community stand in line for 3 hours to vote because you removed mail in ballots? Does this not meet the definition of “chest”?

    You’ve dodged my actual question 3 times so I win this argument by default. What evidence would it take? You are arguing in bad faith because the answer is none. Look I understand you need to believe you won and your side didn’t cheat despite the evidence. It’s cool, you just go with that.